Independent industry shortlist for Rotary Valves
Best Rotary Valves for Abrasive Powders
Answer in brief
The strongest rotary-valve candidates for abrasive powders provide documented wear-resistant construction, controllable clearances, replaceable wear parts, suitable shaft sealing and credible application engineering. This editorial Top 10 ranks evidence for abrasive duty; it cannot predict service life without representative material and operating data.
By Editorial Team · Published July 27, 2026 · Updated July 27, 2026 4 page views
How we selected these companies
Wear-system design 30%
Housing, rotor, tips, endplates and coatings designed around an identified wear mechanism.
Clearance and leakage control 25%
Documented clearances, replaceable parts, inspection limits and control of leakage as wear progresses.
Material and process fit 20%
Ability to match hardness, particle shape, speed, pressure, temperature and required rate.
Maintainability 15%
Access, replaceable wear elements, alignment, manuals and practical overhaul support.
Evidence and testing depth 10%
Current technical data, material-test capability and explicit limits rather than generic heavy-duty claims.
Methodology limitations: Public sources rarely provide comparable wear-test data. Abrasive life depends on particle hardness, shape, size, concentration, velocity, impact angle, temperature, pressure and maintenance. The list does not replace material trials, total-cost analysis, dust-hazard review or model-specific certification checks.
Evidence checked July 27, 2026
Disclosure: Featured placements are commercially supported and clearly labeled. Payment does not determine the editorial assessment.
Abrasive powder does not merely “make the valve wear faster.” It changes clearances, leakage, pocket filling, drive load and sometimes particle size. The correct valve is therefore a maintainable wear system, not just a heavier casting.
How to use this Top 10
Characterize the powder before comparing brands. Record particle hardness, shape, size distribution, bulk density, moisture, temperature and whether wear is dominated by sliding, impact or entrained high-velocity particles.
Define the operating boundary as well: throughput, rotor speed, pressure differential, conveying-gas velocity, duty cycle and acceptable leakage. A valve under a bin and the same valve blowing directly into a line may see very different wear.
Rotor, tips and housing
Replaceable tips can move the wear interface to a service part and help restore clearance. Hardened metals, coatings and ceramics may extend life, but brittle or dissimilar materials introduce their own impact, thermal and repair constraints.
Ask which component is intended to wear first and how it is measured. “Abrasion resistant” is not an inspection plan.
Clearance is a performance variable
Small rotor-to-housing gaps improve airlock behavior but increase sensitivity to thermal growth, deflection, trapped particles and misalignment. Larger gaps tolerate interference but leak more gas.
The supplier should state cold clearances, temperature assumptions, acceptable wear limits and the method for restoring performance. Trend measurements at repeatable rotor positions.
Velocity and feeding mode
Wear rate often rises sharply with particle velocity. Blow-through arrangements can improve discharge for sticky products yet expose surfaces to gas-borne particles. Drop-through designs may reduce that interaction but can struggle if material does not leave the pockets.
Rotor speed affects both capacity and impact frequency. Increasing speed to solve a capacity problem can reduce fill factor and accelerate damage.
Identify the wear mechanism
Sliding abrasion occurs where particles move along a loaded surface. Erosive wear develops when gas-borne particles strike a surface, and impact wear concentrates at abrupt changes in direction or where coarse particles enter a narrowing gap. A single valve can experience all three.
Inspection patterns help diagnose the dominant mechanism. Uniform polishing at tips suggests a different response from a localized groove at the inlet or deep attack in the outlet transition. The repair should address the cause, not just cover the scar with a harder material.
Hardness is not the whole specification
A harder surface may resist sliding wear but become vulnerable to impact or cracking. Ceramic liners can perform well in severe abrasion when they are supported and protected from shock. Weld overlays and thermal-spray coatings introduce thickness, bond and repair considerations.
Ask for the substrate, treatment, hardness range, coating thickness and permitted repair route. Also check corrosion compatibility. A surface that survives abrasion but corrodes in the process atmosphere is not a durable solution.
Shaft seals and bearing protection
Fine abrasive powder can migrate along the shaft and damage seals or bearings. Purged seals may help when clean, compatible gas is available at the right pressure. Packing and lip-seal arrangements have different leakage, adjustment and maintenance behavior.
Outboard bearings reduce direct exposure but do not make the shaft interface maintenance-free. Trend seal leakage, bearing temperature, vibration and drive current alongside clearance measurements.
Thermal growth and rotor deflection
Temperature changes the gap between rotor and housing. Pressure and product loading can deflect components as well. A cold workshop clearance may therefore be unsafe or ineffective at operating conditions.
The supplier should calculate or test the relevant envelope. Startup, shutdown and upset temperatures belong in that review, not just the nominal steady-state value.
Representative wear testing
Standard abrasion tests can compare material coupons under controlled conditions, but they do not reproduce every valve geometry. A useful project test combines material characterization with pilot or reference-duty evidence and a defined inspection interval after commissioning.
Document the starting clearances and surface condition. Without a baseline, the first shutdown inspection produces an interesting photograph but little engineering information.
Maintenance and total cost
Compare the time, tooling and access required to inspect tips, housing, endplates, seals and bearings. Include spare-part lead time, coating repairability and the risk of contaminating product with wear debris.
A lower purchase price can disappear quickly if the complete valve has to be removed whenever clearances drift. Conversely, an elaborate wear package is wasted when the actual powder is only mildly abrasive.
Safety boundary
A worn rotary valve may no longer satisfy the gap conditions assumed for explosion isolation. If the valve has a protective function, inspection limits and replacement criteria must follow the certified configuration and site dust-hazard analysis.
Questions for the shortlist
- What is the expected wear mechanism and sacrificial component?
- Which hardness, coating or ceramic specification is supplied?
- What are the initial and discard clearances?
- How do pressure and gas velocity affect the proposed design?
- What test or reference duty supports the expected maintenance interval?
Related engineering resources
The Rotary Valves guide explains pocket filling and leakage. Compare the broader rotary-valve company list and use the published video resources to review installation, cleaning and powder-feed concepts.
Partner with powderbulkvideos.com
Show your engineering evidence where buyers compare suppliers.
Top List Featured Listings are limited, clearly labelled and commercially separate from editorial selection and rank.
Selected companies
-
Best for: Engineering teams shortlisting rotary-valve suppliers for minerals, fillers, ash, hard granules or other wear-intensive powders.
This entry is assessed for wear-system design, clearance control, material fit, maintenance and technical evidence rather than generic heavy-duty wording. Gericke documents fast-clean, heavy-duty and application-specific rotary-valve families with wear and pressure options. That evidence is relevant when hygiene, leakage, abrasion and process integration must be reconciled in one configuration. The published material establishes a credible shortlist fit, but it does not prove performance for an unspecified powder, route or operating envelope. Confirm the exact model, materials of construction, controls, test basis, exclusions and acceptance criteria in the project proposal.
Evidence: Current official documentation was checked for rotary-airlock construction and features relevant to wear-intensive service. The supplier evidence used for this entry is https://www.gerickegroup.com/solutions/rotary-valves.
Limitations: Public product information cannot predict wear life for an unnamed powder and duty. For Gericke AG, confirm the exact model, construction, certificate scope and test conditions in the proposal; this is editorial position 1, not a performance guarantee.
View related CompanyTechnical score breakdown
- Wear-system design
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Clearance and leakage control
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Material and process fit
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Maintainability
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Evidence and testing depth
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
-
2Best for: Engineering teams shortlisting rotary-valve suppliers for minerals, fillers, ash, hard granules or other wear-intensive powders.
Prater Industries
Abrasive-duty evidence review — Prater Industries
This entry is assessed for wear-system design, clearance control, material fit, maintenance and technical evidence rather than generic heavy-duty wording. Prater Industries documents heavy-duty, quick-take-apart, blow-through and abrasion-resistant airlock variants. That evidence is relevant when wear, temperature, cleaning and transfer geometry require different mechanical arrangements. The published material establishes a credible shortlist fit, but it does not prove performance for an unspecified powder, route or operating envelope. Confirm the exact model, materials of construction, controls, test basis, exclusions and acceptance criteria in the project proposal.
Evidence: Current official documentation was checked for rotary-airlock construction and features relevant to wear-intensive service. The supplier evidence used for this entry is https://www.praterindustries.com/products/rotary-airlock-valves/.
Limitations: Public product information cannot predict wear life for an unnamed powder and duty. For Prater Industries, confirm the exact model, construction, certificate scope and test conditions in the proposal; this is editorial position 2, not a performance guarantee.
View related CompanyTechnical score breakdown
- Wear-system design
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Clearance and leakage control
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Material and process fit
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Maintainability
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Evidence and testing depth
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
-
3Best for: Engineering teams shortlisting rotary-valve suppliers for minerals, fillers, ash, hard granules or other wear-intensive powders.
The Young Industries
Abrasive-duty evidence review — The Young Industries
This entry is assessed for wear-system design, clearance control, material fit, maintenance and technical evidence rather than generic heavy-duty wording. The Young Industries documents catalogues, bulletins and drawings covering distinct inlet, rotor and sealing approaches. That evidence is relevant when a difficult powder requires configuration review rather than a general valve label. The published material establishes a credible shortlist fit, but it does not prove performance for an unspecified powder, route or operating envelope. Confirm the exact model, materials of construction, controls, test basis, exclusions and acceptance criteria in the project proposal.
Evidence: Current official documentation was checked for rotary-airlock construction and features relevant to wear-intensive service. The supplier evidence used for this entry is https://www.younginds.com/equipment/rotary-valves.
Limitations: Public product information cannot predict wear life for an unnamed powder and duty. For The Young Industries, confirm the exact model, construction, certificate scope and test conditions in the proposal; this is editorial position 3, not a performance guarantee.
View related CompanyTechnical score breakdown
- Wear-system design
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Clearance and leakage control
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Material and process fit
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Maintainability
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Evidence and testing depth
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
-
4Best for: Engineering teams shortlisting rotary-valve suppliers for minerals, fillers, ash, hard granules or other wear-intensive powders.
ACS Valves
Abrasive-duty evidence review — ACS Valves
This entry is assessed for wear-system design, clearance control, material fit, maintenance and technical evidence rather than generic heavy-duty wording. ACS Valves documents named valve series with configuration options, capacity tables and maintenance-access information. That evidence is relevant when feeding duty and rapid rotor access are important selection factors. The published material establishes a credible shortlist fit, but it does not prove performance for an unspecified powder, route or operating envelope. Confirm the exact model, materials of construction, controls, test basis, exclusions and acceptance criteria in the project proposal.
Evidence: Current official documentation was checked for rotary-airlock construction and features relevant to wear-intensive service. The supplier evidence used for this entry is https://acsvalves.com/rotary-valves.
Limitations: Public product information cannot predict wear life for an unnamed powder and duty. For ACS Valves, confirm the exact model, construction, certificate scope and test conditions in the proposal; this is editorial position 4, not a performance guarantee.
View related CompanyTechnical score breakdown
- Wear-system design
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Clearance and leakage control
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Material and process fit
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Maintainability
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Evidence and testing depth
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
-
5Best for: Engineering teams shortlisting rotary-valve suppliers for minerals, fillers, ash, hard granules or other wear-intensive powders.
DMN-WESTINGHOUSE
Abrasive-duty evidence review — DMN-WESTINGHOUSE
This entry is assessed for wear-system design, clearance control, material fit, maintenance and technical evidence rather than generic heavy-duty wording. DMN-WESTINGHOUSE documents multiple documented valve variants and installation manuals. That evidence is relevant when an international process plant needs model-specific construction and operating evidence. The published material establishes a credible shortlist fit, but it does not prove performance for an unspecified powder, route or operating envelope. Confirm the exact model, materials of construction, controls, test basis, exclusions and acceptance criteria in the project proposal.
Evidence: Current official documentation was checked for rotary-airlock construction and features relevant to wear-intensive service. The supplier evidence used for this entry is https://www.dmnwestinghouse.com/us/rotary-valves/.
Limitations: Public product information cannot predict wear life for an unnamed powder and duty. For DMN-WESTINGHOUSE, confirm the exact model, construction, certificate scope and test conditions in the proposal; this is editorial position 5, not a performance guarantee.
View related CompanyTechnical score breakdown
- Wear-system design
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Clearance and leakage control
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Material and process fit
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Maintainability
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Evidence and testing depth
- 4/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
-
6Best for: Engineering teams shortlisting rotary-valve suppliers for minerals, fillers, ash, hard granules or other wear-intensive powders.
Kice Industries
Abrasive-duty evidence review — Kice Industries
This entry is assessed for wear-system design, clearance control, material fit, maintenance and technical evidence rather than generic heavy-duty wording. Kice Industries documents VJX construction, maintenance features and selected protection options. That evidence is relevant when dust-collection or pneumatic-conveying service requires maintainable airlock duty. The published material establishes a credible shortlist fit, but it does not prove performance for an unspecified powder, route or operating envelope. Confirm the exact model, materials of construction, controls, test basis, exclusions and acceptance criteria in the project proposal.
Evidence: Current official documentation was checked for rotary-airlock construction and features relevant to wear-intensive service. The supplier evidence used for this entry is https://www.kice.com/product_categories/airlocks/.
Limitations: Public product information cannot predict wear life for an unnamed powder and duty. For Kice Industries, confirm the exact model, construction, certificate scope and test conditions in the proposal; this is editorial position 6, not a performance guarantee.
View related CompanyTechnical score breakdown
- Wear-system design
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Clearance and leakage control
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Material and process fit
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Maintainability
- 4/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Evidence and testing depth
- 4/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
-
7Best for: Engineering teams shortlisting rotary-valve suppliers for minerals, fillers, ash, hard granules or other wear-intensive powders.
Coperion
Abrasive-duty evidence review — Coperion
This entry is assessed for wear-system design, clearance control, material fit, maintenance and technical evidence rather than generic heavy-duty wording. Coperion documents product-specific application scope and selected pressure and hazardous-area information. That evidence is relevant when the rotary valve must integrate with a larger process system. The published material establishes a credible shortlist fit, but it does not prove performance for an unspecified powder, route or operating envelope. Confirm the exact model, materials of construction, controls, test basis, exclusions and acceptance criteria in the project proposal.
Evidence: Current official documentation was checked for rotary-airlock construction and features relevant to wear-intensive service. The supplier evidence used for this entry is https://www.coperion.com/en/products-services/process-equipment/rotary-valves/.
Limitations: Public product information cannot predict wear life for an unnamed powder and duty. For Coperion, confirm the exact model, construction, certificate scope and test conditions in the proposal; this is editorial position 7, not a performance guarantee.
View related CompanyTechnical score breakdown
- Wear-system design
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Clearance and leakage control
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Material and process fit
- 4/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Maintainability
- 4/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Evidence and testing depth
- 4/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
-
8Best for: Engineering teams shortlisting rotary-valve suppliers for minerals, fillers, ash, hard granules or other wear-intensive powders.
Meyer Industrial
Abrasive-duty evidence review — Meyer Industrial
This entry is assessed for wear-system design, clearance control, material fit, maintenance and technical evidence rather than generic heavy-duty wording. Meyer Industrial documents wear-protection construction, quick-access arrangements and model-specific operating information. That evidence is relevant when abrasive or hygienic service makes planned maintenance access important. The published material establishes a credible shortlist fit, but it does not prove performance for an unspecified powder, route or operating envelope. Confirm the exact model, materials of construction, controls, test basis, exclusions and acceptance criteria in the project proposal.
Evidence: Current official documentation was checked for rotary-airlock construction and features relevant to wear-intensive service. The supplier evidence used for this entry is https://www.meyerindustrial.com/product-category/rotary-airlock-feeders-valves/.
Limitations: Public product information cannot predict wear life for an unnamed powder and duty. For Meyer Industrial, confirm the exact model, construction, certificate scope and test conditions in the proposal; this is editorial position 8, not a performance guarantee.
View related CompanyTechnical score breakdown
- Wear-system design
- 5/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Clearance and leakage control
- 4/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Material and process fit
- 4/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Maintainability
- 4/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Evidence and testing depth
- 4/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
-
9Best for: Engineering teams shortlisting rotary-valve suppliers for minerals, fillers, ash, hard granules or other wear-intensive powders.
Carolina Conveying
Abrasive-duty evidence review — Carolina Conveying
This entry is assessed for wear-system design, clearance control, material fit, maintenance and technical evidence rather than generic heavy-duty wording. Carolina Conveying documents drop-through families, size ranges and rotor options. That evidence is relevant when non-standard material characteristics require a configurable valve. The published material establishes a credible shortlist fit, but it does not prove performance for an unspecified powder, route or operating envelope. Confirm the exact model, materials of construction, controls, test basis, exclusions and acceptance criteria in the project proposal.
Evidence: Current official documentation was checked for rotary-airlock construction and features relevant to wear-intensive service. The supplier evidence used for this entry is https://carolinaconveying.com/products/.
Limitations: Public product information cannot predict wear life for an unnamed powder and duty. For Carolina Conveying, confirm the exact model, construction, certificate scope and test conditions in the proposal; this is editorial position 9, not a performance guarantee.
View related CompanyTechnical score breakdown
- Wear-system design
- 4/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Clearance and leakage control
- 4/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Material and process fit
- 4/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Maintainability
- 4/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Evidence and testing depth
- 4/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
-
10Best for: Engineering teams shortlisting rotary-valve suppliers for minerals, fillers, ash, hard granules or other wear-intensive powders.
WAMGROUP
Abrasive-duty evidence review — WAMGROUP
This entry is assessed for wear-system design, clearance control, material fit, maintenance and technical evidence rather than generic heavy-duty wording. WAMGROUP documents drop-through and blow-through families with nominal capacity and selected operating limits. That evidence is relevant when a standard component package fits the defined low-complexity duty. The published material establishes a credible shortlist fit, but it does not prove performance for an unspecified powder, route or operating envelope. Confirm the exact model, materials of construction, controls, test basis, exclusions and acceptance criteria in the project proposal.
Evidence: Current official documentation was checked for rotary-airlock construction and features relevant to wear-intensive service. The supplier evidence used for this entry is https://wamgroup.co.uk/en-GB/WAMUK/Product/RV%20-%20RVR/Drop-Through-Rotary-Valves.
Limitations: Public product information cannot predict wear life for an unnamed powder and duty. For WAMGROUP, confirm the exact model, construction, certificate scope and test conditions in the proposal; this is editorial position 10, not a performance guarantee.
View related CompanyTechnical score breakdown
- Wear-system design
- 4/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Clearance and leakage control
- 4/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Material and process fit
- 4/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Maintainability
- 4/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
- Evidence and testing depth
- 4/5 · 0–5 editorial score based on the cited current product evidence under this list’s stated criterion; it is not a paid placement score.
Frequently asked questions
Which rotary-valve material is best for abrasive powder?
There is no universal best material. Selection depends on the wear mechanism, particle properties, impact, temperature, corrosion and whether tips, liners or the full housing should be sacrificial.
Why do rotary-valve clearances matter in abrasive service?
Wear enlarges clearances, which increases gas leakage and can reduce pressure isolation and feeding stability. Clearances need defined inspection and discard limits.
Can a Featured listing buy a higher rank?
No. Selection and rank remain editorial and follow the published methodology.
Related content
Continue exploring
Move from this page to the companies, videos and technical topics that add useful context.
Videos
ACS Valves
ACS Multi-Port Rotary Valve in 3D
ACS Valves uses a 3D animation to explain a multi-compartment rotary-airlock arrangement for high-volume discharge duties with independent rotors and drives.
4 views
Coperion
Coperion ZRD Rotary Valve for Powder Applications
Coperion presents the ZRD rotary valve and the design choices that adapt it to powder discharge, metering and pneumatic-conveying service.
5 views
DMN-WESTINGHOUSE
DMN-WESTINGHOUSE MZC-II Basic Inspection and Cleaning
DMN-WESTINGHOUSE demonstrates the basic inspection and cleaning context for an MZC-II rotary valve and states the safety boundary for maintenance work.
4 views
Prater Industries
How To Select The Proper Rotary Airlock Valve
Prater Industries explains the process information engineers need before choosing and sizing a rotary airlock valve.
5 views
Kice Industries
Kice VJX Airlock Installation
Kice Industries demonstrates installation considerations for its VJX airlock at a dry-bulk process interface.
12 views